***～会飞的蝎子～学习宁静致远 » 2007年
百度音乐搜索链接
蝎子 发表于 2007-12-31 04:43:04
10月份百度的铃声下载服务将全部指向正版合法的音乐下载地址，并在6个月之内将音乐下载中的非法链接逐步取消。为此，百度将和北京源泉公司及铃声下载服务商共同在收入中分成。在不久的将来，您再也不会在百度上搜索到免费的音乐下载。中国搜索引擎巨头正在将免费音乐下载搜索的大门关闭，取而代之的是有偿音乐下载链接。随着百度的加入，对非法音乐下载的打击，在声势浩大的诉讼之后，正在形成合围之势。
百度一位市场人员向《第一财经日报》透露，百度已和国际及国内音乐版权组织的版权授权监控方北京源泉公司达成协议：10月份百度的铃声下载服务将全部指向正版合法的音乐下载地址，并在6个月之内将音乐下载中的非法链接逐步取消。为此，百度将和北京源泉公司及铃声下载服务商共同在收入中分成。 铃声下载是百度mp3搜索中三大下载链接之一，尽管铃声下载在流量上远远小于歌曲和歌词下载，但根据北京源泉公司在线监控部门的数据，百度mp3铃声下载的流量每天最少90万人次。 根据北京源泉公司透露的分成方案，如果百度把搜索的结果链接指向合法资格的下载地址，除了每个月保底的固定服务费之外，百度还将从每次由百度导向合法音乐下载地址的点击中抽成，“一个铃声下载的费用大约在一元到两元钱，其中百度最起码可以拿到1%或2%。”一位内部人士透露。 这就是说，铃声下载将给百度每年最少带来人民币2000万元左右的收入。 北京源泉公司CEO吴峻透露，他们正在不断地向百度递交整套音乐的非法下载地址，百度也将据此一一关闭链接，“6个月后，所有搜索引擎和各大门户网站将关闭所有非法音乐下载地址的链接，实行全面的正版化。”
根据艾瑞咨询的估计，明年全球在线音乐市场规模将达到16亿美元，而由于中国也有部分群体开始接受在线音乐支付，粗略估计，中国在线音乐的市场规模约在人民币5亿元以上。 目前国内的十家搜索引擎和各大门户网站都和北京源泉公司达成了不同程度的共识，8月15日宣布停止非法音乐下载的网易将是下一个和源泉公司合作的网站。
网易公关部的张颖表示：“网易停止非法音乐的下载完全出于保护音乐人和版权人利益的公心，如果网易继续推出该类服务，必须等在线音乐下载市场完全成熟以后。” 百度总裁李彦宏对本报表示：“作为有重要影响力的一家网站，百度愿意为音乐产业的健康发展提供帮助，但目前互联网上音乐的传播非常复杂，仅靠我们一家是难以扭转这个局面的。” 其余各大网站如一搜、搜狐、新浪等都拒绝对此发表任何看法。
不过,从前一阵子开始, 百度的mp3下载地址确实都已经神秘失踪. 对于今后的发展态势, 相信也会是正版取代非法的时代.
百度一位市场人员向《第一财经日报》透露，百度已和国际及国内音乐版权组织的版权授权监控方北京源泉公司达成协议：10月份百度的铃声下载服务将全部指向正版合法的音乐下载地址，并在6个月之内将音乐下载中的非法链接逐步取消。为此，百度将和北京源泉公司及铃声下载服务商共同在收入中分成。 铃声下载是百度mp3搜索中三大下载链接之一，尽管铃声下载在流量上远远小于歌曲和歌词下载，但根据北京源泉公司在线监控部门的数据，百度mp3铃声下载的流量每天最少90万人次。 根据北京源泉公司透露的分成方案，如果百度把搜索的结果链接指向合法资格的下载地址，除了每个月保底的固定服务费之外，百度还将从每次由百度导向合法音乐下载地址的点击中抽成，“一个铃声下载的费用大约在一元到两元钱，其中百度最起码可以拿到1%或2%。”一位内部人士透露。 这就是说，铃声下载将给百度每年最少带来人民币2000万元左右的收入。 北京源泉公司CEO吴峻透露，他们正在不断地向百度递交整套音乐的非法下载地址，百度也将据此一一关闭链接，“6个月后，所有搜索引擎和各大门户网站将关闭所有非法音乐下载地址的链接，实行全面的正版化。”
根据艾瑞咨询的估计，明年全球在线音乐市场规模将达到16亿美元，而由于中国也有部分群体开始接受在线音乐支付，粗略估计，中国在线音乐的市场规模约在人民币5亿元以上。 目前国内的十家搜索引擎和各大门户网站都和北京源泉公司达成了不同程度的共识，8月15日宣布停止非法音乐下载的网易将是下一个和源泉公司合作的网站。
网易公关部的张颖表示：“网易停止非法音乐的下载完全出于保护音乐人和版权人利益的公心，如果网易继续推出该类服务，必须等在线音乐下载市场完全成熟以后。” 百度总裁李彦宏对本报表示：“作为有重要影响力的一家网站，百度愿意为音乐产业的健康发展提供帮助，但目前互联网上音乐的传播非常复杂，仅靠我们一家是难以扭转这个局面的。” 其余各大网站如一搜、搜狐、新浪等都拒绝对此发表任何看法。
不过,从前一阵子开始, 百度的mp3下载地址确实都已经神秘失踪. 对于今后的发展态势, 相信也会是正版取代非法的时代.
收藏:
QQ书签
del.icio.us
订阅:
Google
抓虾
换个曲～～《崇拜》 by 梁静茹
蝎子 发表于 2007-12-30 12:03:16
你的姿态 你的青睐 我存在在你的存在
你以为爱 就是被爱 你挥霍了我的崇拜
我豁了 我爱了 我都不管了
心爱到疯了 恨到散了就好了
可能的 可以的 真的可惜了
幸福好不容易怎么你却不敢了呢
我还以为我们能不同于别人
我还以为不可能的 不会不可能
风筝有风 海豚有海
所以明白 所以离开
所以不再 为爱而爱
自己存在 在你之外
你以为爱 就是被爱 你挥霍了我的崇拜
我豁了 我爱了 我都不管了
心爱到疯了 恨到散了就好了
可能的 可以的 真的可惜了
幸福好不容易怎么你却不敢了呢
我还以为我们能不同于别人
我还以为不可能的 不会不可能
风筝有风 海豚有海
所以明白 所以离开
所以不再 为爱而爱
自己存在 在你之外
收藏:
QQ书签
del.icio.us
订阅:
Google
抓虾
LA Times sets forth the status
蝎子 发表于 2007-12-24 16:25:24
Between the Beijing Olympics and the U.S. presidential race, we are going to hear a lot about China in the coming year. In our nation's capital, and on the campaign trail, policymakers and politicians tend to paint China as a threat, suggesting that its economic growth means the U.S. is falling behind or that its strength is inherently dangerous.
Americans don't necessarily see it that way. A recent Zogby poll revealed that 52% of the American public holds a favorable impression of China. But only 35% of congressional staffers do. And 86% of those staffers think, wrongly, that Americans have a negative view of China.
John Q. Public has it more right than the politicos. America's relationship with China is not zero-sum. Like other world powers -- India, Russia, Japan and the European Union -- China is more partner than threat. Many of our security interests overlap.
China actually helps us protect our shores from radiological terrorist attacks by allowing the U.S. to station inspectors in the ports of Hong Kong, Shanghai and Shenzhen, the key departure points for more than 3 million shipping containers headed to the West Coast each year. Like it or not, we also rely on China -- ground zero for avian influenza and other potential pandemics -- to spot and contain outbreaks. Without Beijing's deep involvement and cooperation, the U.S. will never persuade North Korea to dismantle its nuclear weapons program. Together, the U.S. and China represent both the problem and the solution to the global climate crisis.
As it gains influence, China no doubt will continue to give solace to America's detractors, such as Hugo Chavez, and to derail U.S. plans that do not further its interests, as in the case of U.N. sanctions against Iran. But China is not a direct military threat, nor could it be for decades to come. Moreover, because China and the U.S. posses nuclear weapons, mutual deterrence will discourage a clash, as it did during the Cold War. Even with the status of Taiwan, which remains the most dangerous flash point, there is ample room for peaceful outcomes. Direct confrontation between the U.S. and China could certainly occur -- it would not be the first time a war made no sense -- but what a disaster that would be for the world economy and global stability.
Even on the economic front, where the news is full of reports of how China manipulates its currency, buys our companies and takes our jobs, the big picture is positive. Overall, its economic growth buoys our own. Trade with China has been responsible for measurable if modest growth in our GDP. Morgan Stanley estimates that China's cheap exports have extended the paychecks of low-income Americans to the tune of 0 billion over 10 years.
Many of the criticisms don't really hold up. All of foreign outsourcing is only responsible for about 2% of the jobs lost in the U.S. If the U.S. is to avert recession, it will be in part because of the dynamism of economies like China's -- and because the Chinese are willing to invest in American companies.
Finally, China is not an ideological competitor. It doesn't have a coherent ideology to export even if it wanted to, beyond, perhaps, "Show me the money." Beijing trades with despicable regimes, but it certainly isn't alone in that regard. We rightly deplore how China represses its citizens, and the U.S. should call Beijing to task forcefully, but we have to acknowledge that our leverage to influence its internal political evolution is very limited.
We cannot rule out that China will become a hostile aggressor one day, and our military must stay prepared for that distant threat. For now, though, the challenge is this: How can we channel China's energy into solving the raft of pressing global problems? How can we get Beijing to pay for the privilege of having a seat at the big power table?
China's growth will cause some Americans to lose their jobs or get paid less. But it is America's job to ensure that our working class is equipped to deal with these disruptions -- not China's. And it is America's job to address the problems that hamper our nation's ability to thrive in a world with multiple strong powers: our broken education system, expensive and inadequate healthcare, budget deficit, crumbling infrastructure and an addiction to oil. All these are problems we have to solve ourselves.
In an election year, it is always tempting for politicians to point the finger at another country. But American voters shouldn't buy it. We should stay focused on the country we have the power to change.
Americans don't necessarily see it that way. A recent Zogby poll revealed that 52% of the American public holds a favorable impression of China. But only 35% of congressional staffers do. And 86% of those staffers think, wrongly, that Americans have a negative view of China.
John Q. Public has it more right than the politicos. America's relationship with China is not zero-sum. Like other world powers -- India, Russia, Japan and the European Union -- China is more partner than threat. Many of our security interests overlap.
China actually helps us protect our shores from radiological terrorist attacks by allowing the U.S. to station inspectors in the ports of Hong Kong, Shanghai and Shenzhen, the key departure points for more than 3 million shipping containers headed to the West Coast each year. Like it or not, we also rely on China -- ground zero for avian influenza and other potential pandemics -- to spot and contain outbreaks. Without Beijing's deep involvement and cooperation, the U.S. will never persuade North Korea to dismantle its nuclear weapons program. Together, the U.S. and China represent both the problem and the solution to the global climate crisis.
As it gains influence, China no doubt will continue to give solace to America's detractors, such as Hugo Chavez, and to derail U.S. plans that do not further its interests, as in the case of U.N. sanctions against Iran. But China is not a direct military threat, nor could it be for decades to come. Moreover, because China and the U.S. posses nuclear weapons, mutual deterrence will discourage a clash, as it did during the Cold War. Even with the status of Taiwan, which remains the most dangerous flash point, there is ample room for peaceful outcomes. Direct confrontation between the U.S. and China could certainly occur -- it would not be the first time a war made no sense -- but what a disaster that would be for the world economy and global stability.
Even on the economic front, where the news is full of reports of how China manipulates its currency, buys our companies and takes our jobs, the big picture is positive. Overall, its economic growth buoys our own. Trade with China has been responsible for measurable if modest growth in our GDP. Morgan Stanley estimates that China's cheap exports have extended the paychecks of low-income Americans to the tune of 0 billion over 10 years.
Many of the criticisms don't really hold up. All of foreign outsourcing is only responsible for about 2% of the jobs lost in the U.S. If the U.S. is to avert recession, it will be in part because of the dynamism of economies like China's -- and because the Chinese are willing to invest in American companies.
Finally, China is not an ideological competitor. It doesn't have a coherent ideology to export even if it wanted to, beyond, perhaps, "Show me the money." Beijing trades with despicable regimes, but it certainly isn't alone in that regard. We rightly deplore how China represses its citizens, and the U.S. should call Beijing to task forcefully, but we have to acknowledge that our leverage to influence its internal political evolution is very limited.
We cannot rule out that China will become a hostile aggressor one day, and our military must stay prepared for that distant threat. For now, though, the challenge is this: How can we channel China's energy into solving the raft of pressing global problems? How can we get Beijing to pay for the privilege of having a seat at the big power table?
China's growth will cause some Americans to lose their jobs or get paid less. But it is America's job to ensure that our working class is equipped to deal with these disruptions -- not China's. And it is America's job to address the problems that hamper our nation's ability to thrive in a world with multiple strong powers: our broken education system, expensive and inadequate healthcare, budget deficit, crumbling infrastructure and an addiction to oil. All these are problems we have to solve ourselves.
In an election year, it is always tempting for politicians to point the finger at another country. But American voters shouldn't buy it. We should stay focused on the country we have the power to change.
收藏:
QQ书签
del.icio.us
订阅:
Google
抓虾
